How can quality assurance/accreditation and academic recognition bodies promote the use and development of OER?


#1

Quality assurance and qualifications recognition have become central elements of higher education at all levels because of its increasing diversity and the mobility of students, researchers and other professionals.

Quality assurance is primarily the responsibility of higher education institutions, although external quality assurance bodies play an essential role in fostering a culture of quality through the assessment of programmes and reviews of institutional quality assurance mechanisms. When assessing the quality of teaching, quality assurance bodies often consider the educational resources that are produced, adapted and used by the institutions (including OER). Quality assurance bodies therefore have a role in ensuring that policies are in place to support the use of OER.

Recognition bodies should also have an understanding of the role of OER in higher education to ensure the fair recognition of qualifications. The missions of quality assurance bodies and recognition bodies are closely linked, and recognition bodies often rely on information provided by quality assurance bodies. Therefore, recognition bodies are also likely to consider the educational resources produced, adapted and used by the awarding institution.

In this context, it is suggested that quality assurance bodies and recognition bodies:

  1. Develop their understanding of OER and how it impacts quality assurance and recognition.
    This could include ensuring that professionals involved in quality assurance and recognition are aware of the increasing importance of OER in the development and use of educational resources by higher education institutions.

  2. Engage in discussions about OER and open licensing.
    Like all other stakeholders in higher education, quality assurance bodies and recognition bodies will need to influence policy developments around OER, focusing on both the opportunities and challenges that OER create. Particular attention might be paid to the shifting terrain of intellectual property rights and copyright, and to developing an understanding of the range of licensing options available for educational resources.

  3. Consider the effects of OER on quality assurance and recognition.
    As OER proliferates it is increasingly important to ensure that quality assurance and recognition principles and processes support the effective use of OER. In this regard, it will be important to review the role and use of OER in improving the quality of teaching and learning and develop criteria for assessing the effectiveness of the integration of OER into institutional practice.

  4. Accept OER creation, adaptation, and adoption as good practices in quality assurance and recognition.
    As creating, adapting, and adopting OER are accepted as good practices within higher education, external quality assurance processes have the potential to redefine their scope and impact. This would ensure a shift in focus towards embedding the creation and use of OER within the institutional culture while monitoring their integration into internal quality assurance practices.

Keywords
OER, quality assurance, accreditation, academic recognition bodies, qualifications, higher education, copyright, practice

Reference
UNESCO and Commonwealth of Learning (2015). Guidelines for Open Educational Resources (OER) in higher education. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0021/002136/213605e.pdf